|
photo sets ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hana-B-Day On the day of the Tokyo Bay fireworks our good friends held a party in their penthouse. From there we could see the fireworks...which I didn't take any pictures of. Get over it. These, however, are the handful that I took at the party. They remind me that the food was good, but more importantly... I need a flash that doesn't suck. ![]() Wednesday, August 13, 2008 Gilles Jobin Sends a Text MessageYet another Weekender article that never made it to the website. In fact, the Weekender site hasn't been updated since the Hawaii issue almost a month ago. When I'm updating my site more often than a bi-weekly magazine... that's bad! Gilles Jobin: Text to SpeechThere are plenty of good reasons to come to Tokyo when it comes to art. The arts scene, like so many other aspects of this city, is strong, independent and increasingly influential abroad. For the very same reason, there are more and more reasons for overseas artists to bring their work to Japan. So for those who love dance, the opportunity to see a work from Gilles Jobin—one revealed to audiences in his native Switzerland as recently as March—is not to be missed. Jobin was classically trained in ballet, but his works are among the most contemporary you could ask for. He is resident choreographer at the Théâtre Arsenic in Lausanne, a position which he has held for many years, while busily piling up international acclaim. On top of a respectable stack of awards, his work The Moebius Strip has had an award-winning documentary filmed about it, and the tours of his productions are very nearly constant. Jobin has spent his career studying the body, movement, and space. And throughout his explorations he has been intuitively, or perhaps even systematically, tearing down assumptions about each of those main ideas. His work is by turns conceptual, physical, aesthetic and even political. The main attractions to Jobin's work are his increasing use of innovative media, and his refusal to stick to one style. His breakthrough work, A+B=Z, was a meditation on the body in both stillness and movement which he called “the body as prison, the body as a living art object.” The piece was highly successful, and yet looking at the bulk of Jobin's work, it was a mere starting point. In The Moebius Strip he forced all movement into the flattened confines of a grid on the stage, allowing only geometry to define movement, and deconstructing any narrative temptations on the part of the audience. In Under Construction he tore into the very fabric of the stage itself, turning it into nothing more than a skin which the dancers could not only move upon, but beneath, breaking its sanctity. Then in Steak House, he recreated an apartment with the dancers as its dysfunctional tenants, reacting to its objects, space and each other until the relationships become so abstract that everything appears to be a part of the space, transforming it. He is renowned for undermining one expectation after another, including a recent commission work for the Grand Théâtre de Genève which was closer, without being truly close, to classical ballet. But most recently, Jobin revealed a work which bridges one of the most unlikely gaps: speech. At least, in a manner of speaking. The work does not venture near to the realm of drama or even narrative—at least not in a deliberate manner—but runs together words and stories in various languages, taken from the internet and broadcast to the stage by way of text-to-speech software, which speaks text documents in a computerized voice manipulated from the stage. This is coupled with a complex, and quite literally “wired” set, interplayed images on several monitors, and of course the dancers occupying the space almost literally between words. The dance, too, seems a pastiche, moving through almost classical segments, ballroom, and Jobin's more signature low-to-the-ground work. Text to Speech presents the computer as mediator for story, sound and image, creating a context for the dancer but also a kind of interruption. Certainly, both speech and text have become daily backdrops to our lives, and at times (consider the nagging psychological need to respond to text-messages) jump insistently to the foreground. It may not be the first dance work to bring in a vocal or text aspect, but the sheer richness and complexity of images, words, sound, movement, and the shifting of unexpected contexts throughout the project promise to make it the choreographer's most ambitious work to date. Text to Speech (Jul. 25–26) Spiral Hall. Omotesando Metro Station. ¥4,300. Fri. 7:30 p.m., Sat. 2 p.m. 03-3498-1171. http://www.spiral.co.jp In a brief comment on this, I went to the performance in Tokyo last weekend and was quite astonished. Jobin is an original. His work falls under the category of dance almost incidentally, and is as much performance art as anything. It was indeed an ambitious work—a wide-ranging one, and completely riveting. I was also irritated to find certain inaccuracies in my column, since I was basing it on what little English information on the performance I could find. One is that the voices being broadcast on stage are not so much a part of the sound-scape, but a framing mechanism. Nor are they snippets culled from the internet (although some of the more background ones may be), instead, they are voices telling us familiar news: urban warfare, suicide bombers, international condemnation—but all set in Switzerland rather than Iraq. This far-fetched imaginary war, in which the United States invades Switzerland to root out terror organizations, becomes the otherworldly, yet frighteningly familiar, backdrop to the rest of the performance which is as strongly political as it is postmodern. Tuesday, July 29, 2008 Turning out the TurnerSince the Weekender frequently drops the ball on the online front in their stumbling hurry to get the print edition out, the Web version of my Turner column has not appeared on their site. So for all three of you reading this (are there that many?) I include it here, since the show will be on until early July, and really ought to be seen: Head Turners of British ArtIt has been best known for giving generous prizes to artists for suspending cows in formaldehyde, using elephant dung in paintings, and simply flipping off the lights. But the Turner Prize has come a long way in its 24-year journey, and has cast its attention-grabbing net far beyond elite art circles to snare headlines in newspapers and even tabloids over its controversial winners. This is mostly for the better, but sometimes for the worse. The see-saw of Turner Prize criticism goes from being overly elitist to overly popularist and back again on a regular basis. Even prize-winner Anish Kapoor once referred to the competition as “a bit of crap.” But the award—and the media surrounding it—has not only done a great deal to make the public care about contemporary art and bring them into the galleries, it has helped shape the character of British contemporary art. Thus, if you're looking for an escape from the encroaching heat rather than into it, you have until July 13 to head into the Mori Art Museum as they host “History in the Making: A Retrospective of the Turner Prize.” This show ran its course at London's Tate Gallery until January of this year, and has now made its way to Tokyo. It includes works by every winner of the prize since its inception in 1984. The show runs in a vaguely chronological manner, opening conservatively with an introduction to the award's namesake, J.M.W. Turner. But turn the corner, and you are soon faced with the ominous Terris Novalis, two enormous and somewhat atypical sculptures by Tony Cragg, and the real nature of the Turner Prize begins to appear. The truth is that this exhibition is more of a “best of” than a retrospective, since only the winners are on parade. There is nothing of the many short-listed artists that enlivened the debate and gave the winners a run for their prize money. However, on the plus side, the pared-down approach leaves plenty of room to view each work in a nice, wide breathing space. One of the Prize's most infamous works is Damien Hirst's Mother and Child, Divided—the now-infamous sculpture involving a cow and calf, each bisected and suspended in formaldehyde. For reasons unknown, the museum has forbidden visitors to walk through the center of the work—an aspect that I always understood to be integral to it. But the piece still gives rise to a symphony of squeals and gasps from unsuspecting punters. If you have a beef with Hirst's cows, Martin Creed's Lights Going On and Off, which consists of an empty room with the lights turning on and off at five-second intervals, is one of the award's too-clever-by-half works. Creed plays with viewers expectations of space and objects in his work. And amusingly, any number of museum patrons will walk right through the installation, only to stop with surprise as the lights turn off (or on) mid-stride. Naturally that isn?t the point, but it?s definitely an amusing side-effect. But there are plenty of more formal sculptures, paintings and video works, including Anish Kapoor's mesmerizing sculpture Void No. 3, and Gillian Wearing's film-portrait Sixty Minute Silence. Conspicuously absent from the Tokyo incarnation of the show is Simon Starling's much-discussed Shedboatshed—a boathouse he turned into a boat, sailed up a river, and then converted back again. But in its stead, we get One Ton II, a photographic work taking up less floor space, but with as much, if not more, conceptual impact. These are the rock stars of contemporary art: some grateful, some reluctant, many controversial, and all heavily discussed. Love them or hate them, this is the once chance you get to see them all in the same place. History in the Making: A Retrospective of the Turner Prize (to Jun. 13) Mori Art Museum. Roppongi Metro Station. ¥1,200. 10 a.m.–10 p.m. (Tue. until 5 p.m.) Tel. 03-5777-8600. www.mori.art.museum Monday, June 2, 2008 FishyOh, the Internet is a wonderful place. Not because I've recently started to play a sad, yet oddly addictive, fishing game (it gets worse!) inside the virtual world of Second Life. But because when I am playing, I keep remembering something my grandfather used to say to me when we went fishing at the camp, or just whenever he felt like it. All I could remember was that it went "Fishy, fishy, bite. Momma says he might..." and the rest was forgotten. But it made me laugh when I was little. And today it occurred to me to look that saying up and see if my grandfather had just made it up. And sure enough, he did not. There weren't many posts, but enough to show that there are different versions, including the one I half remembered: Fishy, fishy, bite. Momma says he might. Daddy says that he don't care. So fishy, fishy, bite. Ain't it great? Tuesday, May 27, 2008 Earth HourEarth Hour apparently went sailing around the world on March 29, although it went pretty much unnoticed in Tokyo, most likely because it was the height of cherry blossom season, and people were drinking in the park rather than worrying about their lights. I'm vaguely annoyed by this whole thing, partly because the name “Earth Hour” makes me roll my eyes, and partly because we've been observing the longer-established and more demanding Candle Night for the last three years or so. Candle Night takes place on the summer and winter solstices (though we've pretty much been ignoring the winter one), and asks you to turn out the lights for two hours. This seems to have more followers in Asia, but the whole thing is now feeling a little like the battle between Beta and VHS (or, to put it in a more contemporary context, Blu-Ray and HD-DVD). And Candle Night is the Beta. Originally, the solstice night made more sense to me than having to remember an apparently random day in March. (The first Earth Hour took place only in Australia, on March 31 of last year. At least that's memorable as the last day of the month. But the 28th of March? That's just random!) On the other hand I have begrudgingly come to the realisation during the solstice, it's always going to be winter in one hemisphere, and people are just less likely to want to sit in the dark during mid-winter. March, on the other hand, is more temperate almost everywhere. The other problem with Candle Night is that people are just not willing to give up that much power-time. They just don't know what to do with themselves for two hours without energy. Earth Hour appeals through its sheer lack of commitment. Curiously, that time commitment is one of the things that the Candle Night website focusses on, and perhaps explains its popularity (not that it is exactly sweeping the nation or anything). Candle Night tends to push the idea of “slowing down” and taking a break from your regular lifestyle. And with the ridiculously stressful lifestyles many people live in Tokyo, the idea of turning out the lights for a couple of hours, lighting some candles, and having dinner or playing a board game or listening to the radio seems to appeal. Sure they're things you could do at any time, but people just forget. Of course, there's nothing wrong with observing all three of these events. Or making your own whenever the hell you like. But there is something appealing about the lights of a city going out for an hour. And something equally appealing about being a part of something local and global at once. If Earth Hour is going to be the big winner, then so be it. We'll bring down the lights for spring. Monday, March 31, 2008 |